We set up automatic collection from the official sources you follow (governments, regulators, public tenders and industry news), write summaries in English, and have a person review them before anything is sent to you.
Packages
| Package | What is included | Timeline | Price in USD | Price in EUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitor Starter | Up to 10 sources, 1 topic, a weekly email summary reviewed by a person | Setup in 2 weeks | US$900 setup + US$450 per month | €850 setup + €420 per month |
| Monitor Pro | Up to 30 sources, daily alerts and a weekly summary, 2 languages, a searchable archive page | Setup in 3 to 4 weeks | US$2,400 setup + US$1,200 per month | €2,200 setup + €1,100 per month |
Fixed-price work is paid 50% when the agreement is signed and 50% at delivery. Monthly plans are billed in advance, with 30 days' notice to cancel. Invoices in USD or EUR. All terms.
Timeline
Week 1: agree on the topic and sources, build and test the collectors. Week 2: test runs, review the first drafts with you, send the first weekly summary.
The same steps for up to 30 sources, plus daily alerts, the second language and the archive page.
Collection runs on schedule, a person reviews, and your summaries and alerts go out.
How we work
Scheduled jobs read feeds, pages and APIs from your sources.
Duplicates and items outside your topic are removed, and the rest are scored for relevance.
Each item gets a short summary, a "why it matters" note, and any deadline the source gives.
A person checks each draft against its source and approves it before it goes into your summary or alert.
Related work
Radar IF is our own monitor for Brazilian health policy. It shows the collection and human-review method. It publishes to a web archive and does not send email, and its content is almost entirely Brazilian.
FAQ
Public sources that publish feeds (RSS or Atom), web pages or APIs: official gazettes, agencies, regulators, procurement portals and industry news sites. We check each source during setup and tell you if one can't be collected reliably or if its terms don't allow automated access.
Yes. In both packages, a person checks each summary against its source before it is sent. In Radar IF, nothing from a feed is published automatically, and the system records who approved each entry and when. Its public methodology page also discloses that entries published before 13 October 2026 were batch-approved rather than read one by one. Your monitor does not work that way: each summary is checked on its own.
We can use a language model to draft summaries, and the person reviewing is responsible for the final text. Radar IF has an optional drafting step through Anthropic's Claude API; it has been switched off since 13 October 2026, and its drafts now come from a rule-based drafter. We agree with you which approach fits your sources.
Only a few. Radar IF's source list includes feeds from WHO, PAHO, the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the US FDA, but almost everything it has published is Brazilian. For your monitor, we build and test collectors for your own source list during setup.
By email, to the addresses you choose. Radar IF does not send email, so we build and test the email delivery with you during setup, before the first live summary.
It covers running your monitor: collection, review, and the summaries and alerts in your package. Monthly plans are billed in advance at the start of each month, and you can cancel with 30 days' notice.
List the sources, the topic and who should receive the summaries. We reply within two business days with questions or a proposal.